Joseph Guereca
Tacony Corporationjotogu04@gmail.com
The Match Score indicates how well the individual aligns with the job. The overall recommendation ranges from 0.5 to 5.0, despite possible label variations
The assessment evaluates traits and competencies to assess the individual's potential for success in a specific role. The Leading Strengths and Potential Weaknesses section summarizes the top 2 traits where the individual falls within or outside the ideal ranges. The blue range represents the ideal scoring range for each trait.
A green indicator represents a score within the ideal range while a yellow indicator refers to a score outside the range. The score line’s position reflects the individual’s score relative to the general population.
The match area (blue area) represents the ideal range for each attribute in the role. The match indicator reflects their natural inclination for each attribute. When within the match area, their natural tendencies are likely to be beneficial. Being outside the match area may limit your natural tendencies and require attention.
Drives Results! They prefer a performance-focused organization where employees strive to be the best.
In work environments that are competitive, goal-oriented, and focused on achieving outcomes above all else.
With leaders who are competitive, push their teams hard, and motivate employees through financial incentives.
With colleagues who are hard-working, driven by personal success and improvement, and focused on individual goals.
In work environments that prioritize relationships over results, require a lot of collaboration, and need consensus before finalizing a decision.
With leaders who are very focused on collaboration, make slower decisions because they wait to consult with others, and prioritize building alliances over getting results.
With colleagues who spend a lot of time socializing, prefer to work on teams instead of independently, and expect decisions to be made by consensus.
Drives Results! They prefer a performance-focused organization where employees strive to be the best.
In work environments that are competitive, goal-oriented, and focused on achieving outcomes above all else.
With leaders who are competitive, push their teams hard, and motivate employees through financial incentives.
With colleagues who are hard-working, driven by personal success and improvement, and focused on individual goals.
In work environments that prioritize relationships over results, require a lot of collaboration, and need consensus before finalizing a decision.
With leaders who are very focused on collaboration, make slower decisions because they wait to consult with others, and prioritize building alliances over getting results.
With colleagues who spend a lot of time socializing, prefer to work on teams instead of independently, and expect decisions to be made by consensus.
Fortune Favors the Bold! They prefer a competitive organization that emphasizes strength and decisiveness.
In work environments where employees are expected to quickly follow orders, with a very firm top-down structure, and where tradition is always respected.
With leaders who are strong and forceful, encourage competition, and reward employees who take decisive action.
With colleagues who are confident, thrive on healthy competition, and strive for personal rewards and recognition.
In work environments that value purpose over power, prefer kindness over competition, and seek to serve the world rather than control it.
With leaders who are more idealistic than practical, provide general guidelines instead of specific instructions, and favor group over individual rewards.
With colleagues who are more focused on the future than on the present reality, would rather act selflessly than competitively, and rely on emotions over facts.
Works Hard, Plays Hard! They prefer a fun organization where employees work passionately and keep things lighthearted.
In work environments that are upbeat, free-spirited, and focused on employees' passions.
With leaders who are passionate, provide wide-ranging guidance to their teams, and always celebrate each team member's success.
With colleagues who are energetic, creative, and fueled by work that interests them.
In work environments that are rigidly focused on rules and procedures, prioritize the efficiency of the company, and emphasize a clear chain of command.
With leaders who focus on clear processes over creativity, limit communication based on the leadership structure, and value collaboration over independence.
With colleagues who over-emphasize rule-following, value the structure provided by the org chart, and emphasize tradition over innovation.
Interested in learning more? Interview Best Practices
Are you prepared to conduct an interview? Great interviews always include these three things: a structured format, specific work-related questions, and consistency in approach.
Use the structured interview questions below to gather additional insight on this person, and follow this process for other people being interviewed. This creates a level playing field, enabling you to compare people using the same standard.
Describe a time when you had an important decision to make, but had several alternatives to choose from. What criteria went into your decision? What was the result?
ANSWER
Tell me about a time when you implemented a solution to a problem and then discovered later that the problem was not fixed. What actions did you take? What was the result?
ANSWER
Tell me about a time when you needed to adapt your communication style to meet the needs of a particular person or audience. What was your approach? What was the outcome?
ANSWER
Tell me about a time when you had a miscommunication with someone. What happened? How did you become aware of the miscommunication? What was the final outcome?
ANSWER
Tell me about a time when you were assigned an important task at work. How did you hold yourself accountable to ensure the task was completed on-time and up to standards? How did you approach the task? What was the result?
ANSWER
Tell me about a time when you were assigned responsibility for a work project, and you did not achieve your desired objective. What was the project? What did you do to accomplish it? Why do you think the project was not completed or fell short?
ANSWER
Describe a stressful situation at work that you experienced. What was the situation? How did you react to it? How did this impact your work performance?
ANSWER
Tell me about the last significant setback you had at work. What was the situation? What happened? How did you react?
ANSWER
Give me examples from your recent work experience in which you contributed to improving the quality of a process, product or service. What was the situation? What did you do? Why? What was the outcome?
ANSWER
In the past, have you developed or helped to develop and implement quality standards and quality measurement processes? Explain the situation. What was your personal involvement?
ANSWER
Describe the last assignment in which you were part of a team. What was your role? What aspects of working as part of a team did you do well? Where could you have improved? Why?
ANSWER
In what types of situations do you prefer to work independently and in what types of situations do you prefer to work as part of a team? Why?
ANSWER
Select the version of the report best suited for your needs. If you need a fast glance at your candidate, we recommend sharing only the Overview page of the report. Read more on the Knowledge Base.
Success! Your report has been shared with .
They will receive a link to view the report in an email.
Select the version of the report best suited for your needs. If you need a fast glance at your candidate, we recommend our Quick read report. You can customize your pdf report. Read more on Knowledge Base.